Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
Authors: |
|
|
---|---|---|
Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
Type: | Resource | |
Storage: | The size of this resource is 221.9 KB | |
Created: | Apr 08, 2022 at 2:13 p.m. | |
Last updated: | Apr 10, 2023 at 6:07 p.m. (Metadata update) | |
Published date: | Jan 23, 2023 at 7:55 p.m. | |
DOI: | 10.4211/hs.03c52d47d66e40f4854da8397c7d9668 | |
Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
Sharing Status: | Published |
---|---|
Views: | 1208 |
Downloads: | 383 |
+1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
Accurately estimating stream discharge is crucial for many ecological, biogeochemical, and hydrologic analyses. As of 2022, The National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) provides up to 5 years of continuous discharge and uncertainty estimates at 28 stream and river sites across the United States. NEON generated annual estimates using Bayesian rating curves that were parameterized based on hydraulic controls and point estimates of discharge collected via acoustic doppler current profilers, salt tracer releases, and flow meter measurements. Inputs to the models were sensor-measured continuous surface water elevations. Here we evaluate the reliability of these discharge estimates, with four approaches. We (1) compared predicted to observed discharge values, (2) compared predicted to observed surface water elevation values, (3) compiled data availability, and (4) calculated the proportion of discharge estimates extrapolated beyond field measurement. We provided diagnostic metrics and evaluations of continuous discharge estimates and continuous stage estimates by month for each site in which continuous discharge data was available as of December 2021, enabling users to rapidly query for suitable NEON data.
Please note, this evaluation is was performed on NEON Discharge REALSE-2022 data and provisional data after 09/30/2019. See new versions of this dataset for future NEON data releases or our code repository to update this analysis locally: https://github.com/spencerrhea/neon_discharge_eval
See publication for details on methods:
Rhea, S, et al. User-focused evaluation of National Ecological Observatory Network streamflow estimates, Sci. Data, 2023.
For more information on NEON sites, see their depictions on the NEON page: https://www.neonscience.org/field-sites/explore-field-sites
For detailed information of each NEON watershed, shapefiles and associated information can be found here: https://www.neonscience.org/data-samples/data/spatial-data-maps
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Temporal
Start Date: | |
---|---|
End Date: |
Content
Related Resources
This resource has been replaced by a newer version | Rhea, S. (2023). NEON Continuous Discharge Evaluation, HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/1a388391632f4277992889e2de152163 |
Credits
Funding Agencies
This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
Agency Name | Award Title | Award Number |
---|---|---|
National Science Foundation | 2106071 |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment