Code and Data: Development of a New Pedotransfer Function Addressing Limitations in Soil Hydraulic Models and Observations
| Authors: | |
|---|---|
| Owners: | Yunquan Wang |
| Type: | Resource |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 110.5 MB |
| Created: | Mar 14, 2022 at 3:26 a.m. |
| Last updated: | Nov 28, 2023 at 12:47 a.m. (Metadata update) |
| Published date: | May 19, 2022 at 8:27 a.m. |
| DOI: | 10.4211/hs.2e1d064c765744db9d4b7855671e641d |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
| Sharing Status: | Published |
|---|---|
| Views: | 1390 |
| Downloads: | 120 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | 1 comment |
Abstract
The attached files include all the data and code applied in the paper
Notion: hr in the soil hydraulic model should be -1.0e4 cm, which was written mistakenly as -1.0e3 cm in Wang et al. (2022)
Wang, Y., Zhou, J., Ma, R., Zhu, G., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Development of a New Pedotransfer Function Addressing Limitations in Soil Hydraulic Models and Observations.
Water Resources Research, 58, e2021WR031406. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031406
The developed pedotranfer function codes for predicting soil hydraulic properties of the FXW and FXW-M1 model from soil texture information are provided in the form of Matlab, Python and R. Please refer to
PTFs_FXW_Matlab.zip and PTF_FXW&SL_Python&R.zip for detail.
The code for improving the predictions of SHPs with the existing PTFs/ or only measurements in high water potential range is provided in code_for_FXW_SHP_EXT.zip.
The readme.txt was included in each zip file.
Subject Keywords
Content
Credits
Funding Agencies
This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
| Agency Name | Award Title | Award Number |
|---|---|---|
| National Natural Science Foundation of China | Nos. 42071045, 41722208 |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
Yunquan Wang 1 year, 3 months ago
Notion: hr in the soil hydraulic model should be -1.0e4 cm, which was written mistakenly as -1.0e3 cm in Wang et al. (2022). We are seeking a correction to this error in the article.
ReplyNew Comment