Understanding the impact of precipitation bias-correction and statistical downscaling methods on projected changes in flood extremes


Authors:
Owners: Alexander Michalek
Type: Resource
Storage: The size of this resource is 5.0 GB
Created: Oct 09, 2023 at 5:12 p.m.
Last updated: Mar 04, 2024 at 9:31 p.m. (Metadata update)
Published date: Mar 04, 2024 at 9:31 p.m.
DOI: 10.4211/hs.45930399530b42c391e642f3c5202a8d
Citation: See how to cite this resource
Sharing Status: Published
Views: 608
Downloads: 61
+1 Votes: Be the first one to 
 this.
Comments: No comments (yet)

Abstract

This contains the data and codes for the study: "Understanding the impact of precipitation bias-correction and statistical downscaling methods on projected changes in flood extremes" by Michalek et. al. (2023). The code for the analysis is provided below. The file name provided the order of the steps taken for the analysis. Note any precipitation related files are not included as they are too large for Hydroshare. Abstract: This study evaluates five bias correction and statistical downscaling (BCSD) techniques for daily precipitation and examines their impacts on the projected changes in flood extremes (i.e., 1%, 0.5%, and 0.2% floods). We use climate model outputs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) to conduct hydrologic simulations across watersheds in Iowa and determine historical and future flood extreme estimates based on generalized extreme value distribution fitting. Projected changes in these extremes are examined with respect to four Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) alongside five BCSD techniques. We find the magnitude of future annual exceedance probability (AEPs) estimates are expected to increase for the future under all SSPs, especially for the emission scenarios with higher greenhouse gases concentrations (i.e., SSP370 and SSP585). Our results also suggest the choice of BCSD impacts the magnitude of the projected changes, with the SSPs that exert limited sensitivity compared to the choice of downscaling method. The variability in projected flood changes across Iowa is similar across the downscaling technique but increases as the AEP increases. Our findings provide insights into the impact of downscaling techniques on flood extremes’ projections and useful information for climate planning across the state.

Coverage

Spatial

Coordinate System/Geographic Projection:
WGS 84 EPSG:4326
Coordinate Units:
Decimal degrees
Place/Area Name:
Iowa
North Latitude
43.7532°
East Longitude
-89.9231°
South Latitude
40.2439°
West Longitude
-96.8665°

Temporal

Start Date: 01/01/1981
End Date: 01/01/2100
Leaflet Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors

Content

    No files to display.

Related Resources

This resource is referenced by Michalek, A. T., Villarini, G., & Kim, T. (2024). Understanding the impact of precipitation bias‐correction and statistical downscaling methods on projected changes in flood extremes. Earth's Future, 12, e2023EF004179. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF004179

Credits

Funding Agencies

This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
Agency Name Award Title Award Number
Iowa Department of Transportation
United States Department of Defense

How to Cite

Michalek, A. (2024). Understanding the impact of precipitation bias-correction and statistical downscaling methods on projected changes in flood extremes, HydroShare, https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.45930399530b42c391e642f3c5202a8d

This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CC-BY

Comments

There are currently no comments

New Comment

required