Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
Deep soil water reservoirs modulate land use and drought effects on the water budget of Amazon headwaters
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 66.1 MB | |
| Created: | Jul 08, 2025 at 7:14 p.m. (UTC) | |
| Last updated: | Aug 21, 2025 at 4:50 p.m. (UTC) | |
| Published date: | Aug 21, 2025 at 4:50 p.m. (UTC) | |
| DOI: | 10.4211/hs.64302ec32fd24341a61f3a0825ee6422 | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource | |
| Content types: | CSV Content |
| Sharing Status: | Published |
|---|---|
| Views: | 1169 |
| Downloads: | 83 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
The southeastern Amazon has been transformed by widespread land use and climate changes, altering the hydrologic cycle. In this seasonally dry tropical forest, the soil water reservoir plays a strong role in mediating the water balance by buffering forests during dry seasons and moderate droughts, as well as modulating runoff to streams. Few studies have examined the response of soil water reservoirs to large-scale forest loss in headwater regions, much less how these changes may influence catchment water balances during droughts. This study compares the water balance of forested and cropland watersheds in the headwaters of the Xingu River basin (Mato Grosso, Brazil). We combined measurements of stream discharge and soil moisture (from 0.3-8m depth) from the 2014-2018 water years, along with remotely sensed precipitation and evapotranspiration data, comparing normal precipitation years to an extreme drought year. Streams within agricultural catchments had four times higher discharge (29% of total precipitation) than in forested catchments (8%). During normal years, this difference was balanced by differences in evapotranspiration. We found that groundwater outflow – water that bypasses a catchment without reaching the stream – is a significant water export term under both landcovers (19% in forest; 26% in croplands). However, during drought years, this outflow disappears in forested catchments and decreases in agricultural catchments, suggesting enhanced groundwater uptake by vegetation that diminishes contributions to rivers downstream. Multiyear droughts projected under future climate changes could threaten the soil water reservoir, leaving forests without a critical resource and downstream communities vulnerable to streamflow loss.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Temporal
| Start Date: | |
|---|---|
| End Date: |
Content
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment