Geophysical measurements of CZO hillslopes and Expectation Maximization classification
| Authors: | |
|---|---|
| Owners: | Andrew Parsekian |
| Type: | Resource |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 146.3 MB |
| Created: | Feb 27, 2020 at 10:52 p.m. |
| Last updated: | Oct 25, 2021 at 7:52 p.m. (Metadata update) |
| Published date: | Oct 25, 2021 at 7:52 p.m. |
| DOI: | 10.4211/hs.775a3bd3d8674bc38ceb160b902e5056 |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
| Content types: | Single File Content Single File Content Single File Content |
| Sharing Status: | Published |
|---|---|
| Views: | 1972 |
| Downloads: | 264 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
Raw data is provides for electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and seismic refraction geophysical measurements in original manufacturer formats. Lippmann 4PL was used for ERT measurement and Geometrics Geode was used for seismic measurement. Picked travel time data (ttx) are included for seismic measurements. Elevation (measured by level-sight and dGPS) and spatial (measured by dGPS) data are included.
Processed products include co-located seismic Vp velocities, ERT inverted log10 resistivities and the calculated hydro-facies classification based on the geophysical data using the Expectation Maximization algorithm.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Coordinate System/Geographic Projection:
WGS 84 EPSG:4326
Coordinate Units:
Decimal degrees
Place/Area Name:
RCCZO, JRBCZO, Bighorn Mtns, Laramie Range, Snowy Range
North Latitude
45.5741°
East Longitude
-104.0303°
South Latitude
34.4414°
West Longitude
-117.2139°
Leaflet Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Content
This resource contains links to external content. Linked content is
NOT stored in HydroShare, and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, or
security.
Related Resources
| This resource is referenced by | Parsekian, A. D., Grana, D., Neves, F. D. A., Pleasants, M. S., Seyfried, M., Moravec, B. G., ... & Kelleners, T. (2021). HYDROGEOPHYSICAL COMPARISON OF HILLSLOPE CRITICAL ZONE ARCHITECTURE FOR DIFFERENT GEOLOGIC SUBSTRATES. Geophysics, 86(3), 1-84. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0438.1 |
| The content of this resource is derived from | Parsekian, A.D., M. Kotikian, G. Paige, A. Carey (2018) Headquarters_Hydrogeophysics_2015_2016_2017. University of Wyoming Research Data Repository, Laramie, WY, USA. https://doi.org/10.15786/m2m1gp |
| The content of this resource is derived from | Parsekian, A.D., D. Thayer, K. Hyde, H.N. Speckman, et al. 2017. NoName Trench Hydrology Geophysics May September 2015. University of Wyoming Research Data Repository, Laramie, WY, USA. https://dx.doi.org/10.15786/M2QQ20 |
Credits
Funding Agencies
This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
| Agency Name | Award Title | Award Number |
|---|---|---|
| National Science Foundation | Water in a Changing West: The Wyoming Center for Environmental Hydrology and Geophysics | 1208909 |
| National Science Foundation | Subsurface Structure and Flow Regime for Rocky Mountain Hillslopes with Different Geologies | 1818550 |
How to Cite
Parsekian, A., T. Kelleners, F. d. A. Neves, M. Pleasants, D. Grana (2021). Geophysical measurements of CZO hillslopes and Expectation Maximization classification, HydroShare, https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.775a3bd3d8674bc38ceb160b902e5056
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment