In downloading this resource contents you are ethically bound to respect the terms of this license.
Please confirm that you accept the terms of this license below before you can do any downloads for this resource.
Resource License Agreement
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
In downloading this resource contents you are ethically bound to respect the terms of this license.
Please confirm that you accept the terms of this license below before you can do any downloads for this resource.
Please wait for the process to complete.
Redirecting to the referenced web URL
The content you have requested to access is not stored in HydroShare, and we can’t guarantee its availability,
quality, security, or size. If the externally linked content is large, access may take time.
Get file URL
You have requested the URL for a file that is within a Discoverable resource.
This resource has Private Link Sharing enabled.
This means that anyone with the link will be able to access the file,
but users without the link will not be permitted unless they have "view" permission on this resource.
You have requested the URL for a file that is within a Discoverable resource.
Only you and other HydroShare users who have been granted at least "view" permission will be able to access this URL.
If you want this URL to be publicly available,
change the sharing status of your resource to "public" or enable Private Link Sharing.
You have requested the URL for a file that is within a Private resource.
This resource has Private Link Sharing enabled.
This means that anyone with the link will be able to access the file,
but users without the link will not be permitted unless they have "view" permission on this resource.
You have requested the URL for a file that is within a Private resource.
Only you and other HydroShare users who have been granted at least "view" permission will be able to access this URL.
If you want this URL to be publicly available, change the sharing status of your resource to "public" or enable Private Link Sharing.
Choose coordinates
Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
The following files/folders contain non-preferred characters in their name.
This may result in problems and you are encouraged to change the name to follow the
HydroShare preferred character set.
Following wildfires, the probability of flooding and debris flows increase, posing risks to human lives, downstream communities, infrastructure, and ecosystems. In southern California (USA), the Rowe, Countryman, and Storey (RCS) 1949 methodology is an empirical method that is used to rapidly estimate post‐fire peak streamflow. We re‐evaluated the accuracy of RCS for 33 watersheds under current conditions. Pre‐fire peak streamflow prediction performance was low, where the average R2 was 0.29 and average RMSE was 1.10 cms/km2 for the 2‐ and 10‐year recurrence interval events, respectively. Post‐fire, RCS performance was also low, with an average R2 of 0.26 and RMSE of 15.77 cms/km2 for the 2‐ and 10‐year events. We demonstrated that RCS overgeneralizes watershed processes and does not adequately represent the spatial and temporal variability in systems affected by wildfire and extreme weather events and often underpredicted peak streamflow without sediment bulking factors. A novel application of machine learning was used to identify critical watershed characteristics including local physiography, land cover, geology, slope, aspect, rainfall intensity, and soil burn severity, resulting in two random forest models with 45 and five parameters (RF‐45 and RF‐5, respectively) to predict post‐fire peak streamflow. RF‐45 and RF‐5 performed better than the RCS method; however, they demonstrated the importance and reliance on data availability. The important parameters identified by the machine learning techniques were used to create a three‐dimensional polynomial function to calculate post‐fire peak streamflow in small catchments in southern California during the first year after fire (R2 = 0.82; RMSE = 6.59 cms/km2) which can be used as an interim tool by post‐fire risk assessment teams. We conclude that a significant increase in data collection of high temporal and spatial resolution rainfall intensity, streamflow, and sediment loading in channels will help to guide future model development to quantify post‐fire flood risk.
This resource contains links to external content. Linked content is
NOT stored in HydroShare, and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, or
security.
Confirm files deletion
This file will be permanently deleted. Consider saving a copy if it is
important to you. If this is the last file in the resource and it is public,
the sharing status will revert to private. If you are not the owner of
this resource, then an owner will need to reset this to public after a new
file has been added. If you want to replace this file, add the new file
first then delete the old one, so that sharing status does not change.
Graduate Assistant - Geology, Hydrology, Geomorphology (San Diego)
How to Cite
Wilder, B. A., A. M. Kinoshita, J. T. Lancaster, P. H. Cafferata, D. B. Coe, B. J. Swanson, W. R. Short (2020). An analytical solution for rapidly predicting post-fire peak streamflows for small watersheds in southern California, HydroShare, https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.9e38375a19cf4355aac466ccd78e8282
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment