Is NWM as good as they say compared to GEOGLOWS?

Authors:
Yubin Baaniya
Owners: Yubin Baaniya
  • Contributions
    Joined

Type: Resource
Storage: The size of this resource is 122.6 KB
Created: Apr 22, 2024 at 9:09 p.m.
Last updated: Apr 22, 2024 at 9:23 p.m.
Citation: See how to cite this resource
Sharing Status: Public
Views: 714
Downloads: 10
+1 Votes: Be the first one to 
 this.
Comments: No comments (yet)

Abstract

This project aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the GEOGLOWS in comparison to the National Water Model (NWM) by extracting and analyzing historical simulation data. Utilizing the VPU unit 702 as a focal point, we will extract historical simulations from both GEOGLOWS and NWM and apply a suite of performance metrics, including Mean Error (ME), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), Pearson's r, and R-squared.

The objective is to assess the goodness of fit for both the global and local models to determine whether the global model (GEOGLOWS) performs comparably to the local model (NWM) in terms of accuracy and reliability in hydrological predictions.

Subject Keywords

Coverage

Spatial

Coordinate System/Geographic Projection:
WGS 84 EPSG:4326
Coordinate Units:
Decimal degrees
North Latitude
46.2920°
East Longitude
-116.4630°
South Latitude
41.9920°
West Longitude
-124.5660°

Temporal

Start Date: 02/01/1979
End Date: 12/31/2020
Leaflet Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors

Content

    No files to display.

How to Cite

Baaniya, Y. (2024). Is NWM as good as they say compared to GEOGLOWS?, HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/b70b69f14dcf4881a15c0af71e5da659

This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.

 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CC-BY

Comments

There are currently no comments

New Comment

required