A Look at GEOGloWS Performance Metrics Across the Globe (V1 & V2) [EDITED]
Authors: | |
---|---|
Owners: | Abin Raj ChapagainYubin Baaniya |
Type: | Resource |
Storage: | The size of this resource is 3.0 MB |
Created: | Mar 05, 2024 at 4:13 p.m. |
Last updated: | Mar 12, 2024 at 4:27 p.m. |
Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
Content types: | Single File Content |
Sharing Status: | Public |
---|---|
Views: | 782 |
Downloads: | 34 |
+1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
Comments: | 3 comments |
Abstract
This study evaluates the performance metrics of observed gauges worldwide on the GEOGloWS versions 1 and 2. The primary objective is to assess the accuracy of the basin identification (comid) assignment on version 2 for bias correction using SABER method. By calculating and comparing performance metrics with the findings from Jorges dissertation on version 1, the analysis aims to validate the comid assignments in GEOGloWS V2, which were determined through an automated process. The goal is to determine whether manual inspection of the approximately 18,000 global gauge stations is necessary to ensure accurate comid assignments, critical for effective bias correction.[EDITED]
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Temporal
Start Date: | 03/04/2024 |
---|---|
End Date: | 03/04/2024 |



Content
Credits
Funding Agencies
This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
Agency Name | Award Title | Award Number |
---|---|---|
NOAA | Global flooed Forecasting | ### ####### |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
Roja Najafi 1 year, 1 month ago
Good job, Yubin. Your research is cool.
ReplyKarina Larco 1 year, 1 month ago
the word GEOGLOWS needs to be in capital, before it was GEOGloWS
ReplyNew Comment